Telangana Election outcomes 2018: Yogi model of politics fails to woo state as TRS heads for landslide victory; BJP struggles to retain seats
The state with over 12 % Muslim inhabitants and Muslim political consolidation within the type of AIMIM, particularly within the state capital Hyderabad, has the right combine for practising the Yogi model of politics. Proper on the eve of the elections, the BJP roped in Swami Paripoornananda within the elections. Although there was hypothesis that Paripoornananda could be offered because the BJP’s chief Ministerial face within the state, he kind of confined to campaigning for the get together’s candidates.
In the meantime, Uttar Pradesh chief minister Yogi Adityanath was introduced in because the star campaigner. Not simply Yogi, even BJP president Amit Shah, proper from the start of the marketing campaign, was focussing on the AIMIM’s stranglehold within the state polity and energy equipment. The TRS-AIMIM bonhomie was the prime goal of the BJP. The saffron get together did not spare the Congress both for having nexus with Asaduddin Owaisi throughout its decade-long regime within the pre-bifurcated Andhra Pradesh.
The BJP leaders had been additionally fast to level out the reported assertion of Asaduddin’s youthful brother and AIMIM chief Akbaruddin Owaisi that allow there be any authorities in Telangana, it needed to give up to MIM. Thus, the BJP was interesting to the folks of Telangana to vote for BJP to liberate the state previously dominated by the Nizams, from the clutches of AIMIM. Even Prime Minister Narendra Modi joined the refrain, referring to the Muslim appeasement politics of TRS and the Congress throughout his election assembly at Mahbubnagar.
Yogi has even promised to vary the identify of Hyderabad to Bhagyanagar, thus the politics of identify altering traveled an extended distance from Uttar Pradesh to the south of the Vindhyas. Even the Ram Mandir figured in Yogi’s marketing campaign. In addition to, the 12 % Muslim quota of KCR regime additionally got here below fireplace from the highest BJP management like Yogi, Amit Shah, and even Modi.
Regardless of the politics of polarisation, the saffron get together didn’t make any vital impression on the fortunes of TRS which is heading for a landslide victory in Telangana. As per the newest reviews, the BJP is struggling laborious to retain its seats together with in Hyderabad the place it has had an affordable presence prior to now. Thus, it’s clear from the outcomes, although an in depth evaluation of voting patterns have to be probed additional, the politics of polarisation presided over by Yogi and Shah didn’t work in Telangana.
The BJP’s bitter criticism didn’t carry any credence because the get together just isn’t thought-about by the Telangana citizens as a critical contender for energy and a reputable opposition for KCR. That is evident from the truth that however the get together’s sharp criticism of KCR, BJP state president Okay Laxman didn’t even wait until the outcomes and provided his get together’s help to TRS minus AIMIM if it falls wanting a majority, with the proclaimed goal of retaining the Congress out of energy. This reveals that polarisation politics works in states the place the saffron get together is a critical participant.
The TRS authorities, particularly KCR, enjoys a optimistic picture and his welfare scheme have benefitted all sections reducing throughout caste and faith. Given the welfarism, polarisation didn’t appeal to the voter.
The Telangana motion noticed a secular mobilisation and the area has a tradition of spiritual concord typically described as Ganga-Jamuni tehzeeb. The state and the town of Hyderabad haven’t seen any main communal flare up for many years now. All these components make Telangana terrain unsuitable for the Yogi model of political mobilisation.
Yogi is a political pilgrim because the TRS describes. The state BJP failed to provide any such chief of some stature in Telangana. Although BJP MLA from Goshamahal Hyderabad, Raja Singh, is notoriously recognized for his extremely communal statements, they typically fail to draw any mainstream viewers or debate and are seen as aberrations in state polity which is essentially not so susceptible to the communal conflagration.