The Times of India wrote an obituary specializing in Karunanidhi’s talents to type alliances with quite a lot of events, in a bit titled ‘He made regional pleasure his political capital’. “The wily satrap might ally with the Congress after struggling its Emergency-era excesses. He might join with the BJP, a celebration that appeared to face for every thing the Dravidian motion opposed. He is been a part of the United Entrance, the BJP-led NDA and the UPA, usually wielding energy disproportionate to his power in Parliament,” it wrote.
“Regardless of new events like MDMK, PMK, DMDK and VCK rising in TN — many with the intention of countering DMK — Karunanidhi managed to attract them into his fold. He was adept at weakening opponents by means of electoral tie-ups, promising them a lot but denying a share in energy. He managed to domesticate a pro-DMK faction in each celebration, besides AIADMK,” the article wrote.
If this spoke of Karunanidhi’s wily machinations, The Indian Express wrote concerning the position performed by secularism, caste, affirmative motion, federalism and regional identification in Karunanidhi’s politics. In an article titled, Combating caste bias, giving area a voice: Karunanidhi’s legacy, its relevance, it stated, “Karunanidhi’s politics engaged with a slew of concepts — secularism, caste, affirmative motion, federalism, regional identification — and their position in public affairs. His demise comes when these points are returning to the political centrestage because the nation strikes in direction of one other basic election…. For Karunanidhi, identification politics was not an finish in itself; he successfully used it to make the administration extra consultant of the state’s social composition and, most significantly, to enhance supply of public providers and items.”
The Hindu, meanwhile, obtained right down to the specifics. An article titled M Karunanidhi: From well being care to neighborhood residing, his schemes had been aimed toward social equality spoke of the varied programmes and schemes launched by the DMK head throughout his 5 phrases as chief minister. “Usually criticised for his city bias, Karunanidhi truly labored fastidiously to craft schemes to woo rural voters, perceived to be the AIADMK’s supporters,” it stated. “Compared to many States and the nationwide common, Tamil Nadu has higher human growth indicators and Karunanidhi’s position on this, because the state’s five-time chief minister, is each essential and substantial.”
An evaluation piece in Deccan Chronicle also paid tribute to insurance policies framed and furthered by Karunanidhi’s DMK. “The abolition of hand rickshaws, creation of the Slum Clearance Board, enlarging the basket of advantages for the depressed and backward lessons, conceding the class of ‘most backward lessons’ in reservation in training and authorities jobs to Vanniyars and a number of other different communities with a 20 % reservation for them, legislating equal property rights for ladies, establishing of the State Planning Fee, liberalising the free rice scheme, the position performed in establishing the Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal in 1990 and establishing the ‘TIDEL’ park that flagged Tamil Nadu’s foray into IT, all go to the DMK’s plus facet,” the article wrote.
The Dravidian motion that Karunanidhi embodied all through his political life was the topic of an obituary in Hindustan Times. Titled Karunanidhi was the final warrior of Tamil Nadu’s Dravidian politics, the article argued that his “lifelong dedication in direction of social justice and frontline advocacy of language made him a champion of Dravidian politics”.
“Karunanidhi was an eloquent orator, a Tamil author of reputation, indomitable writer and all-weather political strategist. He was an unassuming celebration campaigner and devoted communicator who wrote on a regular basis messages to the cadre, penned articles for Murasoli, the DMK’s official newspaper, proofread copies till midnight after which awakened at 4.30 am to learn and report his notes for greater than fifty years of his political life. These qualities are testimony to the exceptional profession of a politician who had been chief minister 5 occasions, was elected 12 occasions to the Tamil Nadu Meeting and as soon as to the erstwhile Tamil Nadu legislative council. Among the many qualities that endeared him to associates, critics and political foes had been his accessibility and talent to face criticism with out bitterness and take heed to totally different views even when he disagreed with them,” it stated.
With inputs from PTI