Constitution is at risk not due to CBI, however because of brazenness of Mamata Banerjee and her followers
Years later, a wave of arguments has been unleashed by political leaders from Opposition events that the CBI’s transfer to grill Kolkata Police commissioner Rajeev Kumar represents a vendetta in opposition to the state authorities headed by Mamata Banerjee. A sure part has additionally questioned the timing of the CBI motion in opposition to Kumar. These arguments nonetheless appear juvenile because of an absence of credibility and at finest seem like a by-product of political opportunism.
Although, these political leaders haven’t clarified on the hyperlink between Kumar and Mamata, the assertion routinely makes the police commissioner the ‘secrets-keeper’ of the chief minister. The tag could not go away simply irrespective of how laborious Kumar tries, as a result of his acts had been unprecedented though not shocking. A former CBI officer BR Lall had famous that lots of his colleagues within the police had been overzealous to serve the state chiefs. Lall stated he had witnessed various cops swear that they might even kill somebody if requested to take action by the chief minister.
He claims to have additionally seen members of the executive service saying that they might do something the chief minister requested — from dismissing a public servant to allotting some valuables in utter disregard of legal guidelines or guidelines, even when such manipulation led to homicide. The Kolkata Police commissioner didn’t commit any homicide. Instead he brazenly sat on dharna with Mamata to oppose the CBI investigation in opposition to him and didn’t flinch from concentrating on his IPS colleagues within the Central company, even sending his cops to encompass the home of the serving joint director of the investigating company.
Switching loyalty is a really delicate and sophisticated affair. Kumar might deceive himself that he’s serving the Constitution, however issues will not be the identical after a change of presidency both on the Centre or state.
Kumar maybe momentarily felt empowered because the chief minister not solely drove to his residence throughout Sunday’s chaos, but in addition supplied safety by launching a scathing assault in opposition to the Central authorities. It is definite that when Kumar joined the IPS cadre in 1989, he should have taken an oath of allegiance to the Constitution of India and to not Mamata. “I XYZ do swear/solemnly affirm that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to India and to the Constitution of India as by law established that i will uphold the sovereignty and integrity of India, and that I will carry out the duties of my office loyally, honestly and with impartiality.”
In his zest or nervousness, Kumar, it seems has shifted his loyalty to the chief minister.
Even the political hue and cry will not be a few rip-off and the way the hard-earned cash of hundreds of poor was swindled by scamsters with the assistance of individuals in energy. The questions concerning the timing of CBI motion will not be restricted to the Saradha rip-off alone. These are being repeated to go well with the political discourse for the reason that days of Bofors and the Jain Hawala case. Former prime minister HD Deve Gowda in contrast the CBI motion to the Emergency and expressed solidarity with the West Bengal chief minister.
Interestingly, simply as Deve Gowda — in an inside CBI convention — had warned investigating officers that issues had been transferring exterior the purview of the Constitution due to soiled politics and a wide range of political ends, leaders are attempting to demolish the picture of CBI — which upholds one of many highest reputations within the nation. Even Congress president Rahul Gandhi, who joined the Opposition leaders in extending help to Mamata, had earlier criticised her for shielding the perpetrators of the Saradha rip-off. His U-turn simply forward of the Lok Sabha election isn’t a surprise.
It can also be not shocking that not a single chief dialling the chief minister has spoken concerning the poor victims of the chit fund rip-off. It is necessary to notice that Supreme Court in May 2014 directed the CBI to take over instances registered in opposition to the Saradha group of corporations at totally different police stations in West Bengal. The court docket had additionally stated that the CBI shall be free to conduct additional investigation by way of Section 173(8) of the CrPC in relation to any case the place a chargesheet has already offered earlier than the jurisdictional court docket in opposition to the businesses concerned in any chit fund rip-off.
The CBI transfer within the Saradha rip-off got here after the court docket order. While the talk has now shifted to Mamata versus Narendra Modi with Kumar rising as a central determine, little is thought concerning the victims of the Saradha rip-off. Mamata ought to know there’s a Sushila Minj in Jalpaiguri, who had invested her pension profit price Rs.2.four lakh and misplaced the cash she had saved for wet days. She is significantly sick and does not have cash for medical therapy. Sushila is just an instance of the form of folks being denied justice in Mamata’s battle to stonewall the CBI within the state.
Whether Mamata reaps political dividends from this whole controversy or the CBI has its credibility restored, the motion of officers embedded within the state’s political institution has brought on irreparable injury to the ethos of khaki.
Firstpost is now on WhatsApp. For the most recent evaluation, commentary and information updates, join our WhatsApp companies. Just go to Firstpost.com/Whatsapp and hit the Subscribe button.