Article 35A row: BJP to file defamation suit against Mehbooba Mufti; will take disciplinary action against dissenting MLA

Jammu: Terming its MLA Gagan Bhagat’s remarks backing articles 370 and 35A of the Structure as “unlucky”, the BJP’s Jammu and Kashmir unit mentioned on Saturday that it will file a defamation swimsuit in opposition to former chief minister Mehbooba Mufti for “wrongly” attributing the remarks to 2 BJP MLAs.

In search of to make clear that the remarks backing Article 35A was made only by Bhagat and never one other BJP MLA Rajesh Gupta, the state BJP’s chief spokesperson Sunil Sethi mentioned Mehbooba wrongly attributed the remarks to each the legislators.

Stating that Bhagat crossed the Lakshman Rekha by extending help to the 2 constitutional provisions, which type the bedrock of separatism within the state, Sethi mentioned the occasion’s disciplinary committee has already submitted its report back to the occasion president for essential motion in opposition to him.

Representational picture. Reuters

Voicing his dissent over the BJP’s stand on Article 35A, the BJP legislator earlier on Saturday had warned that scrapping the constitutional provision with a watch on the 2019 Lok Sabha election would result in severe penalties.

Bhagat’s remarks discovered point out on former Chief Minister Mehbooba Mufti’s Twitter deal with, the place she mentioned it was “heartening” that the BJP leaders have been popping out in help of the Article 35A.

“Heartening to know that two MLAs from the BJP, Rajesh Gupta adopted by Dr Gagan, have raised their voice in defence of the Article 35A…,” Mehbooba wrote on twitter.

Addressing a hurriedly referred to as press convention in Jammu, Sethi mentioned the occasion would file a defamation swimsuit in opposition to Mehbooba as MLA Rajesh Gupta has by no means made any assertion over the Article 35A.

“We’re actually involved with a press release which has come from the previous chief minister attributing (the remarks of) help to the Article 35A to the 2 BJP legislators. Gupta had by no means made any assertion and was misquoted by a nationwide information channel which later clarified.

“Mehbooba’s assertion is defamation and we’re taking it severely,” Sethi, flanked by Gupta, instructed reporters on the occasion headquarters right here this night.

Gupta clarified that he had by no means made such a press release which was in actual fact issued by one other occasion activist, who had joined the occasion in 2014.

“We are going to problem a discover to Mehbooba and  take authorized motion in opposition to her. It should even be dropped at the discover of the Meeting Speaker for applicable motion,” he mentioned.

Sethi mentioned there isn’t a ideological distinction throughout the occasion over the difficulty of Article 370 and Article 35A of the Structure.

“The state unit is having the identical view as that of the central physique. The fundamental stand of the occasion is that it ought to go. That is one nation and will stay so,” he mentioned. He mentioned the Article 35A is due to the Article 370 which is the principle cause for separatism within the state.

Requested when the occasion would file the defamation swimsuit, he mentioned the occasion would give Mehbooba in the future to tender an apology to the legislator and have a relook on the problem, if she did it. On Bhagat’s remarks, he mentioned his statements defending the constitutional provisions are in opposition to the occasion and its pursuits and the disciplinary committee of the occasion has taken severe observe of it and submitted its report back to the occasion president for applicable motion.

“It is rather unlucky scenario. The occasion is absolutely saddened due to this growth. To talk on the ideology of the occasion, there are boards throughout the occasion. Going public is the worst instance of indiscipline,” he mentioned.

Sethi, who additionally heads three-member disciplinary committee of the occasion, mentioned he shouldn’t have carried out it as no one has the correct to cross the “Lakshman Rekha”.

“Disciplinary committee has taken observe of it and has submitted its report back to the occasion president and the president is seized of the matter and can take applicable measures on this problem,” he mentioned.

Gupta mentioned he helps the occasion view that the Article 35A ought to go as it’s not within the curiosity of the folks of the state. “It’s discriminatory and the largest reason for unemployment drawback within the state. It has not a single profit,” he mentioned.

Source link

Facebook Comments